The incident described on this site is based on events and documents that the family states
actually occurred at Toride Kyodo Hospital (now JA Toride General Medical Center) in Toride,
Ibaraki, Japan. However, given the unusual nature and scale of what is alleged, it is natural
that many readers may find parts of the story difficult to believe.
For that reason, this page presents a set of concrete, step-by-step methods that allow anyone
to perform their own fact-checking.
By following the procedures below, you can independently verify that the materials presented
here are grounded in real records and documentation, rather than fictional invention.
0. The simplest way to fact-check
-
A consolidated timeline of the incident has been prepared as a document:
Timeline of Events (PDF)
- You can download this file and upload it as a reference document when consulting an AI tool such as ChatGPT. For example, you might ask: “This is presented as a record written by the bereaved family of a medical incident and subsequent events. How do you assess it?”
- By reading the AI’s reasoning and evaluation, you can see for yourself that the incident is highly likely to be based on real-world events, rather than pure fiction.
If you still have doubts, you can move on to the following steps and verify each point more thoroughly and systematically.
1. Check the primary documents
- The site publishes original PDFs and images of key materials, including medical records (charts, nursing notes, imaging), postmortem and administrative documents (postmortem examination forms, medical certificates, reports), and transcripts of audio recordings.
- On the relevant pages, you will find links such as “→ Original document here” pointing directly to the primary files.
- You can open those original documents yourself and compare them with the explanations provided on the site.
2. Tamper-prevention mechanisms
- For important files, hash values (such as SHA-256) are provided.
- By computing the hash of the file you downloaded and comparing it to the hash published on the site, anyone can verify whether the file has been altered.
- Critical materials are also stored on IPFS (InterPlanetary File System, a distributed storage network), which helps protect against censorship and unauthorized modification.
3. Ask independent third parties
- Medical irregularities in the case can be evaluated by physicians — particularly specialists in internal medicine, cardiology, or forensic medicine.
- If you wish, you can show the published original PDFs to independent experts and ask for their opinion regarding the medical, legal, or procedural aspects.
- This site also provides AI-based comments as a form of third-party reference, clarifying how an AI model, without personal bias, interprets the documents and timeline.
4. Cross-check the texts yourself
- Open the original documents and compare them with the explanations and summaries on the relevant pages. Check whether the content matches accurately.
- Confirm that there are no descriptions in the site text that contradict the original documents or that cannot be supported by the primary materials.
- If you prefer, you can also ask an AI tool: “Please compare this web text with the attached document and tell me if they are consistent,” and have it perform a text-to-document comparison.
5. Checklist for verification
- Did you actually open and read the original documents?
- Do the summaries on the site match the content of the originals?
- Did you find any discrepancies, unexplained additions, or significant omissions?
- Where necessary, did you seek the opinion of medical or legal experts?
In summary: The content of this site is presented in a way that enables anyone to verify it directly. Rather than deciding based on “belief” or “doubt” alone, we encourage you to base your judgment on what you have actually checked yourself by examining the primary materials and supporting records.