Family Profile
— Background of the Bereaved Family and the Circumstances Surrounding the Case

1. Family Structure

Our family consists of the following members:

• Father — Victim of the 2010 medical accident and suspicious death
• Mother — Self-employed business owner
• Elder son (myself) — Physician
• Younger son — Office worker (lives separately)

We were, and remain, a close-knit family. The sudden loss of our father under abnormal circumstances, followed by inconsistent explanations and irregularities in postmortem procedures, immediately raised concerns that something was profoundly wrong.

2. Elder Son — Professional Background

I am the elder son, and my profession is that of a physician. I currently work in internal medicine at a mid-sized hospital in Japan. My responsibilities include:

• Clinical care in general internal medicine
• Participation in the hospital’s Medical Safety Management Department
• Analysis of incident reports and hospital safety systems
• Internal conferences and educational activities related to medical safety

My medical training has allowed me to:

• Correctly interpret medical records
• Analyze catheterization videos (PCI), CT scans, and diagnostic data
• Identify contradictions between clinical findings and physicians’ explanations
• Recognize abnormalities in the postmortem procedures

Without this professional background, it would have been extremely difficult to discover the extent of the irregularities described throughout this website.

It is precisely because I am a physician that I could identify that my father’s death was not consistent with a natural clinical course, and that key evidence pointed toward medical malpractice, concealment, and possible external interference.

3. At the Time of the Incident — I Was a Medical Student

At the time of my father's medical accident and suspicious death in 2010, I was still a medical student. Because of this, I did not yet have the full clinical knowledge or confidence to immediately recognize inconsistencies in the physicians’ explanations.

However, even as a student, I felt that certain aspects of the case were abnormal:

• The explanations did not align with basic medical principles
• The progression of my father's condition was unusually contradictory
• Key findings (such as cardiac tamponade and bleeding) were omitted
• Postmortem procedures contained irregularities

As my medical training progressed in the years that followed, I began to understand the magnitude of the inconsistencies. Once I became a physician and gained experience in internal medicine and medical safety management, I realized that:

My father’s clinical course and the explanations provided were medically implausible.

This realization prompted me to begin a thorough investigation of all available medical records, imaging data, and postmortem documentation.

4. Signs of Surveillance, Interference, and External Pressure

Over the years, our family experienced several unusual events that suggested possible external monitoring or interference. While we cannot draw definitive conclusions, these incidents occurred repeatedly and in contexts related to our attempts to uncover the truth.

Examples include:

• Emails and calls to lawyers and reporters going unanswered in a coordinated manner
• Attempts to report the case to media outlets being systematically blocked
• Suspicious individuals frequently appearing near us in public settings
• Unusual behavior by local authorities during key moments
• Interference with marriage activities and business succession

These incidents are described in detail on the respective pages of this site. Common features across these events include:

• Synchronization across unrelated institutions
• Patterns inconsistent with ordinary administrative mistakes
• Repeated obstruction specifically at moments when the truth was close to surfacing

While we do not assert any specific entity or motive, the consistency of the pattern suggests that:

Our family may have been subjected to systematic obstruction during our efforts to seek answers.

This possibility reinforced the necessity of preserving all documentation and making the information publicly available.

5. A Message to Readers — Our Request for Your Support

We are sharing this information not out of anger or resentment, but out of a sincere hope that what happened to our father will never happen to anyone else.

For more than a decade, we have faced:

• irregularities in medical records and postmortem procedures,
• a lack of accountability from institutions involved,
• systematic obstruction when seeking legal advice,
• silence or unexplained rejections from major media outlets,
• interference in various aspects of daily life.

Despite these obstacles, we have continued our efforts because we believe that:

The truth must be preserved, and society must be informed so that similar tragedies can be prevented.

We kindly ask for your cooperation — whether you are a journalist, researcher, legal expert, medical professional, or simply someone who cares about truth and justice.

Any form of support — verification, analysis, reporting, or sharing — would be deeply appreciated.

→ Contact information